Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Effect of grinding chemicals and aids on the grinding efficiency and the performance of Portland cement
Download
index.pdf
Date
2023-8
Author
Kalkan, Ömer Faruk
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
180
views
323
downloads
Cite This
Cement production is an energy-intensive process. Cement grinding alone accounts for a third of the total energy used in this process. Improving grinding efficiency is therefore crucial to saving energy. Grinding aids (GA), chemical substances that improve grindability, are adsorbed on the cement surface and reduce its surface energy. As a result, the cement particles agglomerate less during grinding and form a finer cement, leading to increased energy efficiency. In addition, GAs can also affect consistency of the cement mortar and alter the mechanical properties of the cement. This study evaluates the performance of some grinding chemicals (GCs) and GAs, which are mixtures of GCs, on the properties of cement. Amines, polyols, defoamers and polycarboxylate ethers (PCE) are used as GCs. Tests are carried out at constant specific energy consumption (SEC) and their performance at fixed fineness is estimated by regression. Among the GCs, at constant fineness, propyleneglycol (PG) provided the highest energy savings at 9.8%, AF-A provided the highest flow increase at 15.2%, tetrahydroxyethylethylenediamine (THEED) provided the highest early strength increase at 9.4%, and monoethyleneglycol (MEG) provided the highest standard strength increase at 6.7%. Moreover, it was also shown that GCs can be optimized to obtain GAs. Among the GAs tested, GA-E provided the highest energy savings at 12.1%, GA-A provided the highest flow increase at 17.9% and the highest standard strength increase at 17.5%, and GA-C provided the highest early strength increase at 23.1%.
Subject Keywords
Grinding aid
,
Specific energy consumption
,
Surface energy
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/105266
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Ö. F. Kalkan, “Effect of grinding chemicals and aids on the grinding efficiency and the performance of Portland cement,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2023.