Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
Download
s13421-022-01281-7.pdf
Date
2023-04-01
Author
Karadöller Astarlıoğlu, Dilay Zeynep
Sümer, Beyza
Ünal, Ercenur
Özyürek, Aslı
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
44
views
31
downloads
Cite This
Prior work with hearing children acquiring a spoken language as their first language shows that spatial language and cognition are related systems and spatial language use predicts spatial memory. Here, we further investigate the extent of this relationship in signing deaf children and adults and ask if late sign language exposure, as well as the frequency and the type of spatial language use that might be affected by late exposure, modulate subsequent memory for spatial relations. To do so, we compared spatial language and memory of 8-year-old late-signing children (after 2 years of exposure to a sign language at the school for the deaf) and late-signing adults to their native-signing counterparts. We elicited picture descriptions of Left-Right relations in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili) and measured the subsequent recognition memory accuracy of the described pictures. Results showed that late-signing adults and children were similar to their native-signing counterparts in how often they encoded the spatial relation. However, late-signing adults but not children differed from their native-signing counterparts in the type of spatial language they used. However, neither late sign language exposure nor the frequency and type of spatial language use modulated spatial memory accuracy. Therefore, even though late language exposure seems to influence the type of spatial language use, this does not predict subsequent memory for spatial relations. We discuss the implications of these findings based on the theories concerning the correspondence between spatial language and cognition as related or rather independent systems.
Subject Keywords
Language and cognition
,
Sign language acquisition
,
Spatial language
,
Spatial memory
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126344109&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/105720
Journal
Memory and Cognition
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
D. Z. Karadöller Astarlıoğlu, B. Sümer, E. Ünal, and A. Özyürek, “Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults,”
Memory and Cognition
, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 582–600, 2023, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126344109&origin=inward.