Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Belt and Road Initiative in Central and Eastern Europe: Different Responses
Download
Ozge Kotan- METU THESIS -LAST VERSION.pdf
Date
2023-11
Author
Kotan, Özge
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
28
views
33
downloads
Cite This
The 16+1 cooperation, initiated in 2012 and retroactively assigned the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) label, has provided a unique regional instance to expand China's influence in sixteen Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Due to China's investments in CEE countries, the region has been receiving more and more strategic focus. Indeed, the evolution of the BRI had an impact on the EU's stance towards China, leading them to recognize China as a "systemic rival". The aftermath of the 2008 crisis created an advantageous environment for China in the region. China briefly emerged as a promising alternative for CEE countries that had been economically reliant on Western economies. As the BRI reaches its 10th anniversary, while some CEE countries are still committed to the BRI, the eagerness of most of the CEE countries to involve in the BRI is progressively turning into frustration. Accordingly, the objective of this thesis is to focus on the responses of CEE countries toward the BRI and, in order to understand the reasons for the variation of responses, examine the specific cases of Hungary and the Czech Republic by exploring motivations, strategies, and outcomes of their engagement with the BRI.
Subject Keywords
Belt and Road Initiative
,
16+1 Cooperation
,
Central and Eastern Europe
,
Hungary
,
Czech Republic
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/106033
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Ö. Kotan, “Belt and Road Initiative in Central and Eastern Europe: Different Responses,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2023.