Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature
Download
index.pdf
Date
2023-01-01
Author
Kerman, Nafiseh Taghizadeh
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem
Karami, Mortaza
Er, Erkan
van Ginkel, Stan
Noroozi, Omid
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
69
views
21
downloads
Cite This
Online peer feedback is an effective instructional strategy to enhance students' learning processes and outcomes. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of the influential factors that play a key role in the effective implementation of online peer feedback. This systematic review provides an overview of the current state of online peer feedback implementation in higher education contexts and explores the role of students' characteristics and online learning environments in relation to their learning processes and outcomes. To achieve this goal, the PRISMA method was followed, and a coding scheme was developed to create a framework that can guide the implementation of online peer feedback in higher education settings. This framework depicts factors that should be taken into account for effective implementation of online peer feedback in terms of four dimensions: students' characteristics (demographic characteristics, academic background, and personality and psychological features), environmental conditions (learning platform and setting), learning processes (content, feedback activity design, and technology), and learning outcomes including cognitive outcomes (e.g., acquisition of knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation), behavioral outcomes (engagement, communication, and teamwork), and affective outcomes (satisfaction, motivation, attitude, self-efficacy, sense of autonomy, and confidence). We conclude this study by discussing the framework, limitations, and ideas for future research and practice.
Subject Keywords
Higher education
,
Learning outcomes
,
Online learning
,
Peer feedback model
,
Systematic review
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/106289
Journal
Education and Information Technologies
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
N. T. Kerman, S. K. Banihashem, M. Karami, E. Er, S. van Ginkel, and O. Noroozi, “Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature,”
Education and Information Technologies
, pp. 0–0, 2023, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/106289.