Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A comparison of SAR filtering techniques on agricultural area identification
Date
2010-12-01
Author
Ozdarici, Asli
Akyürek, Sevda Zuhal
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
105
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the most frequently used non-adaptive and adaptive Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) filtering techniques called; Mean, Median, Lee, Lee-sigma, Local Region, Frost and GammaMAP. Envisat ASAR Precision Image (PI) mode data acquired on August 2008 is used to examine the filtering techniques. Three test sites (∼ 4 km 2), located in Karacabey of Bursa in northwest of Turkey are selected. Two of them consist of homogenous agricultural fields and the third one is selected from lake. One of the agricultural test sites has 143 fields where seven different crop types namely; corn, pasture, pepper, sugar beet, tomato, wheat, and watermelon exist. The other agricultural test site contains relatively smaller agricultural fields and it has 386 fields where corn, rice, sugar beet, tomato, wheat, and watermelon are cultivated in it. After correcting the images geometrically, the filtering operations are applied on the amplitude data using 5×5 windows. The filtering performances are evaluated by computing difference of means (MeanDif), difference of standard deviation (StdDif), correlation, and quality factor (Q). If the conditions of these evaluation indicators provide the smallest possible means, standard deviation and the maximum correlation and Q, it can be stated that the filtered image preserves the spectral information of the original image while reducing the speckle effect. Based on this evaluation the most reliable outputs are achieved by applying the Lee filter when compared with the original data. This technique is followed by the results of the Mean, Median, Gamma-MAP and Frost filters.
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84868524905&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/107140
Conference Name
American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference 2010: Opportunities for Emerging Geospatial Technologies
Collections
Department of Civil Engineering, Conference / Seminar
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
A. Ozdarici and S. Z. Akyürek, “A comparison of SAR filtering techniques on agricultural area identification,” San Diego, CA, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, 2010, vol. 2, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84868524905&origin=inward.