Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Assessment of the best available wastewater management techniques for a textile mill: Cost and benefit analysis
Date
2010-01-01
Author
Dogan, Bugce
Kerestecioglu, Merih
Yetiş, Ülkü
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
22
views
2
downloads
Cite This
In the present study, several water recovery and end-of-pipe wastewater treatment alternatives were evaluated towards the evaluation of Best Available Techniques (BATs) for the management of wastewaters from a denim textile mill in accordance with the European Union's Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive. For this purpose, an assessment that translates the key environmental aspects into a quantitative measure of environmental performance and also financial analysis was performed for each of the alternatives. The alternatives considered for water recovery from dyeing wastewaters were nanofiltration (NF) with coagulation and/or microfiltration (MF) pre-treatment, ozonation or peroxone and Fenton oxidation. On the other hand, for the end-of-pipe treatment of the mill's mixed wastewater, ozonation, Fenton oxidation, membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge (AS) process followed by membrane filtration technologies were evaluated. The results have indicated that membrane filtration process with the least environmental impacts is the BAT for water recovery. On the other side, MBR technology has appeared as the BAT for the end-of-pipe treatment of the mill's mixed wastewater. A technical and financial comparison of these two BAT alternatives revealed that water recovery via membrane filtration from dyeing wastewaters is selected as the BAT for the water and wastewater management in the mill. © IWA Publishing 2010.
Subject Keywords
Best available techniques
,
Cost-benefit analysis
,
Cross-media effects
,
IPPC directive
,
Textile industry
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/107619
Journal
Water Science and Technology
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.006
Collections
Department of Environmental Engineering, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
B. Dogan, M. Kerestecioglu, and Ü. Yetiş, “Assessment of the best available wastewater management techniques for a textile mill: Cost and benefit analysis,”
Water Science and Technology
, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 963–970, 2010, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/107619.