Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
IMPACT OF EMOTIVE AND COGNITIVE REASONING IN MORAL AND POLITICAL THINKING: A PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY
Download
10603492 - MA - İsmail Deniz Demirkan.pdf
Date
2023-12-27
Author
Demirkan, İsmail Deniz
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
247
views
143
downloads
Cite This
This thesis aims to relate the distinction between emotive and cognitive reasoning in the moral and political philosophy. The distinction refers to automatic and controlled processes of thinking; the former relates to the emotional and instinctive reaction to the given problem whereas the latter is related to a contemplative and more proactive manner. Emotive reasoning tends to be made automatically whereas cognitive reasoning is produced as a result of a controlled process. In this regard, this thesis argues that acknowledging and understanding the distinction between these types of reasoning could be utilized for the betterment of the way moral/political philosophy is put into practice because with this distinction, it is possible to implement a more impartial and realistic point of view in these philosophical fields. In other words, this thesis aims to establish the relationship between emotive-cognitive reasoning distinction and ethics-political philosophy on the one hand, and critically evaluate how this distinction could be utilized for normatively improving these fields on the other. In order to understand this distinction properly, a detailed investigation of studies in neuro-ethics and neuro-politics, together with evolutionary psychology that gives reference to this distinction is essential. In the process, the characteristic differentiation between descriptive and normative statements will be taken into account, on the basis of Hume’s distinction between is-ought statements and Moore’s naturalistic fallacy, so that how descriptive features of emotive-cognitive reasoning would be used for normative argumentation could be shown.
Subject Keywords
Automatic and Controlled Processes of Thinking, Evolutionary Psychology, Neuro-Ethics, Neuro-Politics
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/107655
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
İ. D. Demirkan, “IMPACT OF EMOTIVE AND COGNITIVE REASONING IN MORAL AND POLITICAL THINKING: A PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY,” M.A. - Master of Arts, Middle East Technical University, 2023.