Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Injected current patterns for electrical impedance imaging of the human thorax
Date
1993-01-01
Author
Eyüboğlu, Behçet Murat
Hampson, Brett M.
Pilkington, Theo C.
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
11
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Commonly used current injection methods in Electrical Impedance Imaging (Ell) — the adjacent electrode current patterns, the opposite electrode current patterns, and the cosine current patterns — were compared to maximize the current flow into the organs of interest in the human thorax. For the analysis, a two-dimensional boundary element model of the human thorax was used. Currents flowing into the different parts of the thorax were calculated as a fraction of the total current applied to the model. Previous authors have used constant sum squared current and constant power to compare different current patterns. The medical device safety regulations, however, limit the total current that can be injected into the human thorax. When the total input current flow into the body is kept constant, the opposite electrode current patterns give the highest current flow into almost all parts of the thorax. Higher current density in a particular region means higher sensitivity to the changes in that region's conductivity. With opposite electrode current patterns, the mean of the fractional current (MFC) flow into the heart, the lungs, and the aorta is increased, respectively, by about 3.5 times, 2.5 times, and 4.6 times the MFC flow obtained by using the adjacent electrode current patterns. With the opposite electrode current patterns, the MFC flow into the heart is over 25%, the MFCs into the lungs are about 18%, and the MFC flow into the aorta is about 30% more than the MFCs obtained by using the cosine current patterns. © 1993 Quest Publishing Co.
Subject Keywords
Bioelectric Impedance
,
Electrical Impedance Imaging
,
Electrical Impedance Tomography
,
Imaging, Electrical Impedance
,
Impedance Tomography, Electrical
,
Tomography, Adaptive Current
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0027591765&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/108146
Journal
Journal of Clinical Engineering
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004669-199305000-00013
Collections
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
B. M. Eyüboğlu, B. M. Hampson, and T. C. Pilkington, “Injected current patterns for electrical impedance imaging of the human thorax,”
Journal of Clinical Engineering
, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 225–234, 1993, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0027591765&origin=inward.