Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Selectively manipulating softness perception of materials through sound symbolism
Download
fpsyg-14-1323873.pdf
Date
2023-01-01
Author
Nalbantoglu, Hamza
Hazir, Beyza Melis
Dövencioğlu, Nahide Dicle
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
183
views
151
downloads
Cite This
Cross-modal interactions between auditory and haptic perception manifest themselves in language, such as sound symbolic words: crunch, splash, and creak. Several studies have shown strong associations between sound symbolic words, shapes (e.g., Bouba/Kiki effect), and materials. Here, we identified these material associations in Turkish sound symbolic words and then tested for their effect on softness perception. First, we used a rating task in a semantic differentiation method to extract the perceived softness dimensions from words and materials. We then tested whether Turkish onomatopoeic words can be used to manipulate the perceived softness of everyday materials such as honey, silk, or sand across different dimensions of softness. In the first preliminary study, we used 40 material videos and 29 adjectives in a rating task with a semantic differentiation method to extract the main softness dimensions. A principal component analysis revealed seven softness components, including Deformability, Viscosity, Surface Softness, and Granularity, in line with the literature. The second preliminary study used 27 onomatopoeic words and 21 adjectives in the same rating task. Again, the findings aligned with the literature, revealing dimensions such as Viscosity, Granularity, and Surface Softness. However, no factors related to Deformability were found due to the absence of sound symbolic words in this category. Next, we paired the onomatopoeic words and material videos based on their associations with each softness dimension. We conducted a new rating task, synchronously presenting material videos and spoken onomatopoeic words. We hypothesized that congruent word-video pairs would produce significantly higher ratings for dimension-related adjectives, while incongruent word-video pairs would decrease these ratings, and the ratings of unrelated adjectives would remain the same. Our results revealed that onomatopoeic words selectively alter the perceived material qualities, providing evidence and insight into the cross-modality of perceived softness.
Subject Keywords
Sound symbolism
,
Cross-modal perception
,
Onomatopoeia
,
Turkish onomatopoeia
,
Haptic (tactile) perception
,
Material perception
,
Softness perception
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/109042
Journal
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1323873
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
H. Nalbantoglu, B. M. Hazir, and N. D. Dövencioğlu, “Selectively manipulating softness perception of materials through sound symbolism,”
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
, vol. 14, pp. 0–0, 2023, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/109042.