Examining Non-Science Majors' Knowledge of Scientific Practices in Evaluating Scientific Media Claims

Date

2025-03-01

Author

Bezci, Filiz
Sungur, Semra

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

36
views

5
downloads

Cite This

This study examines the knowledge of scientific practices that non-science undergraduate students need to critically evaluate scientific claims in the media. Employing a cross-sectional quantitative research design, the study gathered data through a self-report instrument involving 266 undergraduate students from non-science disciplines. A twelve-item, two-tier multiple-choice assessment was utilized, featuring questions from two research articles adapted from popular media. Findings reveal that non-science majors often struggle to understand the scientific practices necessary to evaluate scientific reports in mainstream media. Results also indicate that many participants fail to recognize the importance of controlled, randomized experimental designs in establishing cause-and-effect relationships. Additionally, findings suggest that students do not fully grasp that hypotheses are supported by evidence rather than proven and that scientific claims must be based on substantial proof. The study further shows that many participants underestimate the importance of peer review in validating scientific claims. Finally, the analysis revealed no significant gender differences in students' competencies related to critiquing these reports.

Subject Keywords

Evaluating scientific claims, non-science majors, popular media, gender

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/113926

Collections

Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Article