Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
THE IDEOLOGICAL CONTESTATION OVER THE ISTANBUL CONVENTION IN TÜRKİYE: ANTI-GENDER MOVEMENTS AND FEMINIST STRUGGLE
Download
melike_bozdogan_PhD_10713538.pdf
Date
2025-4-11
Author
Bozdoğan, Melike
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
110
views
74
downloads
Cite This
This dissertation inquiries into the ideological contestation between the gender advocacy movement and anti-gender movement surrounding the ratification of and withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention (IC) in Türkiye. Despite widespread public support and the political will for the IC before and during its ratification, Türkiye became the first country to withdraw from the Convention only a decade after its adoption. Disputes surrounding the IC in this dissertation are analyzed through the lens of the contentious politics framework. This research argues that the anti-gender mobilization in Türkiye has structured itself as an ideological countermovement to gender advocacy. Hence the study problematizes the coordinated discursive efforts of anti-gender activism and the anti-IC campaign, and analyzes how Türkiye's feminist movement has been responding to the anti-gender movement during and after the withdrawal from the IC. To illustrate how anti-gender advocates stigmatized the IC and disseminated this interpretation to broader society, this research employed a critical discourse analysis to relevant news from conservative media outlets between 2020 and 2023. In addition, semi-structured in-depth interviews were also conducted with gender advocacy actors to tap into their perception of the IC and how they have updated their movement repertoires to respond to gender-conservative ideological attacks. Hence, the study also underlined the consequences of the immediate post-IC era, the feminist actors' reflections on the meanings, and legacies of their struggles against gender-based violence and the prospects of gender advocacy as they have resorted to strategies of "cautious activism" and a "silent struggle."
Subject Keywords
Gender-based violence (GBV), violence against women (VAW), anti-gender movement, gender advocacy movement, the Istanbul Convention (IC)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/114111
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. Bozdoğan, “THE IDEOLOGICAL CONTESTATION OVER THE ISTANBUL CONVENTION IN TÜRKİYE: ANTI-GENDER MOVEMENTS AND FEMINIST STRUGGLE,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2025.