Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Orange Peel Waste Valorization: An Integrated Assessment of Environmental and Economic Sustainability in Animal Feed Production
Date
2025-01-01
Author
Dilek, Filiz Bengü
Barampouti, Elli M.
Mai, Sofia
Moustakas, Konstantinos
Malamis, Dimitris
Martin, David S.
Yetiş, Ülkü
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
295
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This study examines the environmental and economic sustainability of producing a feed ingredient from waste orange peels (OP), for use in animal feed, focusing on two waste valorization strategies: one involving hydrolyzed and the other non-hydrolyzed OP. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies were employed to assess the environmental impacts and economic feasibility. LCA data were derived from lab-scale experiments and existing literature, using the ReCiPe 2016 (H) method to quantify environmental impacts per tonne of animal feed. Key findings show that hydrolyzing OP results in higher impacts compared to non-hydrolyzed variant, primarily due to the saccharification-hydrolysis process, though this difference becomes negligible at the animal feed production stage. Sensitivity analysis reveals that variations in input materials, except for transport distance—particularly for the non-hydrolyzed variant—have limited effects on LCA outcomes. Comparisons with business-as-usual scenarios (landfilling, composting and incineration) show that while waste valorization reduces environmental impacts, it does not surpass incineration due to energy recovery potential. LCC analysis indicates that producing non-hydrolyzed feed ingredient is significantly more cost-effective than the hydrolyzed variant. Overall, the LCA and LCC results suggest that while OP waste valorization offers notable environmental benefits, non-hydrolyzed feed ingredient production is the more economically viable option, contributing to sustainable feed production. This study highlights the importance of integrating both environmental and economic considerations in waste valorization strategies and provides guidance for waste management companies and animal feed manufacturers to support circular economy practices.
Subject Keywords
Animal feed
,
LCA
,
LCC
,
Waste orange peel
,
Waste valorization
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002212860&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/114352
Journal
Waste and Biomass Valorization
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-025-03044-2
Collections
Department of Environmental Engineering, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
F. B. Dilek et al., “Orange Peel Waste Valorization: An Integrated Assessment of Environmental and Economic Sustainability in Animal Feed Production,”
Waste and Biomass Valorization
, pp. 0–0, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002212860&origin=inward.