Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
The Place of Logic in Philosophy
Download
950110.pdf
Date
2019-12-31
Author
Grünberg, David
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
69
views
30
downloads
Cite This
Having drawn the distinction between logic as a discipline and logic as organon, this short paper focuses on the latter, the purpose of which is twofold. First, it highlights the importance of second-order logic and modal logic in ontology. To this aim, the role of second-order logic is illustrated in formalizing realist ontology committing to the existence of properties. It is also emphasized how quantified modal logic helps clarify de re/de dicto distinction that implicitly takes place in ordinary language. Secondly, the paper concentrates on the significance of modal logic in the philosophy of language. In pursuing this goal, we considered Kripke’s notions of rigid designator, necessary a posteriori and contingent a priori statements. Given the definition of rigid designator, it is possible to prove in quantified modal logic that an identity between proper names, like “Hesperus” and “Phosphorus”, if true, is necessarily true. But the truth of the identity statement “Hesperus = Phosphorus” is known a posteriori. Therefore, there are necessary a posteriori truths. There are also contingent a priori true statements like “The length of stick S at time t0 = one meter”, as there exists a possible world in which this statement is false.
Subject Keywords
Second-order logic
,
quantified modal logic
,
possible-worlds semantics
,
necessary a posteriori
,
contingent a priori
URI
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iufad/issue/52167/682308
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/114426
Journal
Felsefe Arkivi
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp2019-5128
Collections
Department of Philosophy, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
D. Grünberg, “The Place of Logic in Philosophy,”
Felsefe Arkivi
, no. 51, pp. 351–353, 2019, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iufad/issue/52167/682308.