Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Initial validation of the Turkish version of the defense mechanisms rating scales-self-report-30
Date
2024-06-01
Author
Yilmaz, Meltem
Taş, Berke
Çelik, Deniz
Perry, J. Christopher
Tanzilli, Annalisa
Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia
Lingiardi, Vittorio
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
167
views
0
downloads
Cite This
The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30) was recently developed to add a self-report alternative to the assessment of defenses, reflecting their generally accepted hierarchical organization. In this study, we aimed to examine psychometric properties and factor structure of the Turkish language version of the DMRS-SR-30. The sample consisted of 1.002 participants who filled out a survey comprising the DMRS-SR-30, the Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Inventory of Personality Organization through Qualtrics. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a three-factor structure (CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.05) that confirms the DMRS theoretical frame with a relatively acceptable fit. Defensive categories and total scale scores showed good to excellent reliability (alpha values ranging from 0.64 to 0.89). Correlations between defenses, symptoms, and personality functioning demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. The individuals with clinically significant BSI scores (T-score >= 63) differed on the DMRS-SR-30 scores from the individuals in the non-clinical range. The Turkish version of the DMRS-SR-30 is a reliable and valid instrument to self-assess the hierarchy of defense mechanisms and overall defensive functioning. Moreover, the current study supports the validity of the tripartite model of defenses in a language and culture different from the origins of the DMRS and DMRS-SR-30.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115337
Journal
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432170
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. Yilmaz et al., “Initial validation of the Turkish version of the defense mechanisms rating scales-self-report-30,”
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
, vol. 15, pp. 0–0, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115337.