Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
REGIONAL DECENTRALIZATION, HEALTH POLICY AND COVID-19: THE CASE OF THE REGIONS OF LOMBARDY AND VENETO, ITALY
Download
10740894-Phd-Hazal Pehlivan.pdf
Hazal Pehlivan - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2025-8
Author
Pehlivan, Hazal
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
6957
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Crisis constitutes the most critical test for decentralized governance. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed stark differences in the regional crisis management capacities of Lombardy and Veneto, two Italian regions operating under the same national legal framework but governed by distinct models of healthcare decentralization. This paper argues that the effectiveness of regional decentralization hinges upon a triadic condition of efficiency: policy-making must be community-sensitive, regional decision-making must be centralized, and policy implementation must be autonomous. Drawing on Bob Jessop’s strategic-relational approach (2008), which conceptualizes the state through the interrelated dimensions of representation, organization, and intervention, the study explores how different regional healthcare models of Lombardy and Veneto shape regional crisis governance capacities. This framework is operationalized through Şengül’s assemblage (2023) to examine multi-scalar and multi-actor governance of implementation, which allows for an in-depth examination of territorialized crisis responses. While Jessop’s framework theorizes the causal dynamics behind crisis responses, Şengül’s assemblage (2023) captures the relational and scalar mechanisms through which regional actors navigate and negotiate institutional constraints. Together, these approaches provide a robust analytical lens to explain why Veneto’s anticipatory, territorially embedded, and community-sensitive interventions were more effective during the first wave of the pandemic, whereas Lombardy’s fragmented and hospital-centric strategy resulted in systemic overload.
Subject Keywords
Regional decentralization
,
healthcare governance
,
COVID-19 crisis
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115435
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
H. Pehlivan, “REGIONAL DECENTRALIZATION, HEALTH POLICY AND COVID-19: THE CASE OF THE REGIONS OF LOMBARDY AND VENETO, ITALY,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2025.