Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of Offense and Defense in Israel’s Strategic Posture
Download
10741008.pdf
Mehmet Okan Arıkan - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2025-8-6
Author
Arıkan, Mehmet Okan
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
12921
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This dissertation explains Israel’s offensive and defensive strategic postures by employing neoclassical realism. Neoclassical realism considers the systemic impact rooted in the domain out of the state’s sovereign control as primary causal. However, diverging from neorealism, neoclassical realism incorporates both material and ideational variables through a co-consideration of international systemic incentives and domestic factors. Following neoclassical realism, the dissertation argues, Israel’s strategic behavior is an output of a process of causation originating from regional isolation, existential insecurity and offensive strategic tradition. These material, ideational and cultural elements are enduring products of historical social processes exerting causal powers conditioning decision makers to adopt offensive strategic posture. The impact of the material element, regional isolation, is primarily causal. The ideational and cultural elements, existential insecurity and offensive strategic tradition influence the domestic processes and so condition the perception and the response of Israel’s state elite. However, shift from offense to defense is possible with the emergence of two conditions in the international realm: Unilateral great power intervention and/or presence of major regional divisions through a crisis in the Middle East. In this setting, additional powers would intervene and disrupt the preexisting causal mechanisms. Complete explanation of offensive and defensive strategic postures necessitates transcending generic independent and intervening variables and explaining their causal mechanisms under these. To this end, the dissertation conducted historical comparative analysis with an explanatory six-case study. Within-case analysis identified context specific variables and explained their powers by building causal narratives through outcome explaining process tracing. Causal narratives were then evaluated through cross-case analysis with small-N comparison.
Subject Keywords
Neoclassical realism
,
Israel
,
Foreign policy
,
Strategic behavior
,
Causal mechanisms
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115443
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. O. Arıkan, “A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of Offense and Defense in Israel’s Strategic Posture,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2025.