Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
AI vs Human: A quasi-experimental study on ChatGPT and teacher feedback for English as a foreign language young learners’ writings
Download
Sena_Turkoglu.pdf
Sena Türkoğlu - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2025-9-15
Author
Türkoğlu, Sena
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
2566
views
0
downloads
Cite This
The present study aimed to investigate the efficiency of ChatGPT-generated feedback by comparing it to teacher feedback on fourth-grade primary school EFL students’ writings. A quasi-experimental mixed-method design was used, incorporating quantitative analyses of writing scores and qualitative analyses from questionnaires (Likert-scale items and open-ended questions) and semi-structured interviews. Over ten weeks, students completed five writing tasks and received feedback from either ChatGPT or teachers, both using a four-category rubric. Questionnaires and interviews examined student perceptions, while statistical analyses (repeated-measures ANOVA and independent samples t-tests) explored differences in writing performance and perception variables such as usefulness, motivation, and clarity of feedback. Interviews were transcribed and coded in MAXQDA to identify themes. Findings showed both feedback types positively influenced writing progress, but in different ways. Teacher feedback offered consistent improvement, contextual appropriateness, an affective bond, accurate suggestions, and promotion of higher-order thinking. ChatGPT feedback was valued for immediacy and constant support, enhancing student motivation. Questionnaire and interview results indicated that teacher feedback was the preferred type. There remains a need for more longitudinal and comprehensive studies on AI feedback in young learners’ writing. Recommendations for future implications include guiding educational practice, informing EdTech design, supporting AI developers, and fostering early development of autonomous learning.
Subject Keywords
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
,
Teacher feedback
,
ChatGPT
,
Young learners
,
Second language (L2) writing
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115621
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Türkoğlu, “AI vs Human: A quasi-experimental study on ChatGPT and teacher feedback for English as a foreign language young learners’ writings,” M.A. - Master of Arts, Middle East Technical University, 2025.