Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Law, Architecture and City: Courthouses of Ankara In 2000s
Download
index.pdf
GÖKÇENUR YAZAR.pdf
Date
2025-9
Author
Yazar, Gökçenur
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
4768
views
0
downloads
Cite This
As a normative field tightly interwoven with political power, law has long been institutionalized and spatialized through the courthouse, enabling judicial power to operate autonomously. The courthouse has historically embodied urban centrality, monumental representation of judicial authority, and purpose-built spatial configurations tailored to judicial requirements. Today, shifting conceptions of courthouses are reshaping the relationships between law, architecture, and the city. This transformation has reached a critical point with the unplanned fragmentation, displacement, and relocation of judicial spaces. This study positions the socio-political dimension of the evolving relationship between the courthouse and the city as an object of architectural inquiry, problematizing the haphazard relocations of Ankara’s courthouses. Since the mid-2000s, allocation policies have fragmented and relocated judicial spaces to additional service buildings, spawned from the Ankara Palace of Justice, and have generated a network of judicial spaces that are architecturally, functionally, and representationally incoherent. The proliferation of non-purpose-built service buildings has weakened the institutional and spatial unity once embodied by the main courthouse. By analyzing the process and consequences of this spatial fragmentation, this study highlights how the unplanned and inconsistent spatialization of courthouse units across Ankara’s districts undermines the judicial system’s urban presence, disrupts its public perception, and challenges the preservation of its institutional unity. Independent judiciary’s dependent spatiality should be problematized through legal, architectural, urban, social, and political discussions to reflect on the future projections for judicial spaces in general, and in Ankara.
Subject Keywords
Law and architecture
,
Judicial spaces
,
Courthouse and city
,
Ankara courthouses
,
Sociopolitics of city courthouses
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115691
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
G. Yazar, “Law, Architecture and City: Courthouses of Ankara In 2000s,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2025.