Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
From ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ to the ‘governance of counterurbanisation’: Structuring pro-rural relocations through planning regulation of housing
Download
1-s2.0-S0743016725003092-main.pdf
Date
2025-12-01
Author
Scott, Mark
Kelleher, Luke
Fox-Rogers, Linda
Gkartzios, Menelaos
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
9540
views
73
downloads
Cite This
Over the last four decades or more, counterurbanisation studies have focused on statistical analyses of deconcentrated population trends or demand-side explanations to understand ‘who’ is moving, ‘where’ and ‘why’. These studies, however, tend to overlook how individual preferences are ‘structured’ or influenced by supply-side enablers or constraints. In this paper, we argue that regulatory and policy regimes also matter in shaping counterurbanisation processes and outcomes. In other words, ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ intersects with the governance of counterurbanisation. We examine this theme through exploring the role of land-use planning in relation to regulating rural housing supply that enables or constrains counterurbanisation movements, drawing on Ireland as a case study. Utilising data from development plans, planning applications and a household survey, we evaluate the role of the planning system in identifying ‘where’ counterurbanisation is more likely to be accommodated through new development and in applying criteria in relation to ‘who’ is permitted to build a new rural property, including a range of social and economic criteria to determine an intrinsic need to live in a rural locality. This results in a group we identify as ‘familiar counterurbanisers’. We argue that rural housing policies have been constructed around a counterurbanisation narrative, resulting in policies that privilege selective pathways for counterurbanisers moving to rural localities, specifically for those with a pre-existing connection to rural places (e.g. family links, return migrants).
Subject Keywords
Counterurbanisation
,
Ireland
,
Land-use planning
,
Rural housing
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105014450602&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115842
Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103868
Collections
Department of City and Regional Planning, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
M. Scott, L. Kelleher, L. Fox-Rogers, and M. Gkartzios, “From ‘counterurbanisation as practice’ to the ‘governance of counterurbanisation’: Structuring pro-rural relocations through planning regulation of housing,”
Journal of Rural Studies
, vol. 120, pp. 0–0, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105014450602&origin=inward.