Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Argumentation Quality in GMO: Sources of Knowledge as Predictor
Date
2025-08-28
Author
Bostancı, Burcu
Yılmaz Tüzün, Özgül
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
2444
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This study aimed to investigate how well middle school students’ use of sources of knowledge can predict their argumentation quality in genetically modified organisms. A correlational research approach was utilized, and 272 middle school students formed the sample. The Use of Sources of Knowledge Questionnaire (Klaver et al., 2022) was utilized in the data collection. It was translated and adapted into Turkish in the context of genetically modified organisms (GMO) by the researchers of the study, which had the dimensions of external, school, and visit resources. To obtain students’ arguments, the GMO Task (GMOT) developed by Xiao (2015) was used. The GMOT was extended with additional questions so that students answered for arguments, counterarguments, and rebuttals, respectively. Zohar and Nemet’s (2002) argumentation quality grading scale was adopted in the study to score students’ argumentation qualities. The descriptive statistics showed that students had fairly low argumentation quality. Among the use of sources of knowledge, students had the most use from visit resources, followed by external and school resources. Multiple regression analysis showed that students’ visit resources in the GMO context were the only statistically significant predictor of their argumentation qualities. The study shows that visit resources can be impactful in improving students’ argumentation qualities. Therefore, there is a need to consider place-based education and outdoor learning settings more often so that students can improve their argumentation qualities. In further studies, the context of socioscientific issues should also be considered since students’ sources of knowledge might vary among them.
URI
https://virtual.oxfordabstracts.com/event/73500/submission/328
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115927
Conference Name
The 16th Conference of The European Science Education Research Association (ESERA 2025)
Collections
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Conference / Seminar
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
B. Bostancı and Ö. Yılmaz Tüzün, “Argumentation Quality in GMO: Sources of Knowledge as Predictor,” presented at the The 16th Conference of The European Science Education Research Association (ESERA 2025), Kobenhavn, Danimarka, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://virtual.oxfordabstracts.com/event/73500/submission/328.