Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROBUST PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS METHODS ON HIGH-DIMENSIONAL AND CONTAMINATED DATA: SIMULATIONS AND REAL- WORLD APPLICATION
Download
10753449.pdf
EMRE BATARLAR.pdf
Date
2025-8-27
Author
Batarlar, Emre
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
805
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Principal Component Analysis is a common and widely used dimensionality reduction and pattern extraction technique, but its sensitivity to outliers can lead to distorted results. To overcome this problem, robust principal component analysis algorithms have been developed over the years. These algorithms offer resistance to contamination while preserving data structure. This thesis provides a detailed and comprehensive comparative analysis of robust PCA algorithms, including ROBPCA, PCP, Spherical PCA, Cauchy PCA, and two Projection Pursuit-based methods, against classical PCA. The evaluation was conducted on both real and custom simulated datasets with controlled contamination levels. Algorithm performances was assessed using various metrics such as explained variance, angle between principal directions, eigenvalue estimation error, and computational time. ROBPCA consistently demonstrated the best trade-off between robustness, interpretability, and computational efficiency. Cauchy PCA performed well under severe contamination, particularly in high-dimensional settings. PCP showed poor performance in terms of scalability and accuracy under contamination. Analysis findings showed that different algorithms have different trade-offs between outlier resistance, dimension reduction, and data preservation. The findings help researchers select the appropriate robust PCA method for their scenario based on different data characteristics, contamination levels, and computational constraints. This thesis fills a literature gap by creating an evaluation framework for robust PCA algorithms across various application contexts.
Subject Keywords
Principal Component Analysis
,
Robust PCA
,
High-dimensional Data
,
Dimensionality Reduction
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/115989
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
E. Batarlar, “A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROBUST PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS METHODS ON HIGH-DIMENSIONAL AND CONTAMINATED DATA: SIMULATIONS AND REAL- WORLD APPLICATION,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2025.