Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Inhabiting The Narrative Territory of Architecture
Download
10753497.pdf
arch-s.ozcivanoglu.pdf
Date
2025-8-27
Author
Özcivanoğlu, Sonat
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
345
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This thesis adopts a diagnostic stance toward contemporary architectural practice, critiquing how architectural theory has shifted away from prioritizing the human condition and activities of inhabitation toward a managerial mode. It proposes the two acts inherent to human beings, narration and building, as acts of making sense. Narration restores a human dimension to time, while architecture makes space inhabitable. The thesis highlights a unique parallelism between narrativeness and architecture, as well as the acts of narration and building, discernible by identifying the conditions that define narrativeness. Criteria delineating the indisputability of narrative can be correlated with conditions intrinsic to architectural practice, among which the search for meaning in relations between events and bodies can be denoted as the fundamental precondition. Another perspective of this parallelism follows Ricoeur’s conceptualization of narration as mimetic activity in Time and Narrative. The thesis situates architectural practice and theory within a narrative territory, grounded in the Aristotelian mimesis/muthos pair, Ricoeur’s reading of muthos as emplotment forms the core of the parallelism (understanding architectural design as emplotment, a configurative act), and his conceptualization of ‘threefold mimesis’ (prefiguration–configuration–refiguration) provides the theoretical framework. The thesis proposes defining architectural acts as mimetic activities encompassing not only the configurative acts of architectural design in discussion, but also considering inhabitation and building activities. Within this understanding, architectural design acts become a meditation between preconceptions regarding inhabitation and its refiguration, an act of making sense of inhabitation through building.
Subject Keywords
Narrativeness, Mimesis/Muthos, Emplotment, Ethos, Configuration
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/116040
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Özcivanoğlu, “Inhabiting The Narrative Territory of Architecture,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2025.