Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Developing guidelines for the implementation of generative ai in higher education: A stakeholder-engaged approach
Download
10602001.pdf
Eren Bekar - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2025-9-29
Author
Bekar, Eren
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
91
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) is reshaping teaching, assessment, and research across universities. Yet many institutions lack actionable, value-sensitive guidance that safeguards integrity, equity, and privacy. This study developed comprehensive ethical guidelines for responsible Gen-AI integration in higher education, specifically within Social Sciences, addressing the urgent governance gap and ethical uncertainties impacting academic integrity, critical thinking, and digital equity. A qualitative investigation utilized deductive thematic analysis from three focus groups comprising Social Sciences academics and master’s/doctoral students. An initial 13 ethical values and principles, derived from meta-document analysis, guided the inquiry. Data analysis employed a “Real-Life Situation → Value-Related Concern → Solution/Policy Suggestion” schema. Thirteen ethical values and principles were consolidated into 8 core categories (e.g., Honesty and Transparency, Reliability, Equality). Findings showed consensus on Gen-AI disclosure and concerns about cognitive laziness and creativity erosion, alongside calls for unified institutional policies. Tensions arose from divergent stakeholder priorities (academic integrity vs. efficiency) and trade-offs between equitable access to paid tools and data privacy. Educators reported increased workload for verification and assessment. This research demonstrates the efficacy of a participatory, value-driven methodology in bridging abstract ethical principles with practical implementation. The framework offers a replicable model for institutions to foster responsible Gen-AI use. Recommendations include integrating clear Gen-AI usage policies in syllabus, mandating transparent disclosure, designing diversified assessments, providing institutional tool access, and establishing multi-layered governance frameworks.
Subject Keywords
Generative AI
,
Higher education
,
Ethics
,
Participatory design
,
Policy guidelines
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/116154
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
E. Bekar, “Developing guidelines for the implementation of generative ai in higher education: A stakeholder-engaged approach,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2025.