Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Intelligent‑TPACK in practice: design and evidence from a three‑week teacher preparation module
Download
Intelligent TPACK in practice.pdf
Date
2025-12-01
Author
Aldemir, Tugce
Kılınç, Selçuk
Bicer, Ali
Grant, Patricia
Davis, Trina
Sweany, Noelle Wall
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
43
views
1
downloads
Cite This
Rapid advances in generative AI sharpen the need for teachers to develop pedagogical and ethical capacities for AI‑integrated instruction. While Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) provides a valuable framework for technology integration, it does not fully capture AI's unique complexities. This study presents an integrated i‑TPACK approach that extends Intelligent‑TPACK by adding AI‑as‑content (i‑CK) and AI‑for‑professional development (i‑PD) and by threading a five‑stage AI‑literacy progression (Know→ Use→ Evaluate→ Ethics→ Create) within each domain, treating ethics as distributed and iterative. We designed and examined a three-week professional development module for preservice teachers using a convergent mixed-methods design. Pre–post surveys (n = 25 matched pairs) with a six‑subscale Integrated i‑TPACK instrument showed statistically significant gains across all domains (Wilcoxon, Holm‑adjusted; medium‑to‑large effects). Qualitative analyses of lesson artifacts, decision logs, reflections, and micro-teaching documented instances of layered ethical decision-making (privacy/data governance, bias/fairness, transparency/provenance/accountability), progression along the AI literacy stages, and discipline-aligned pedagogical designs. Embedding an ethical decision‑making checkpoint across performance‑based activities made ethics visible in teacher work and coincided with more explicit safeguards and verification steps in lesson artifacts and micro‑teaching within the module. By detailing this empirically grounded model, our study offers theoretical and practical insights for teacher educators seeking to cultivate principled GenAI-supported instruction.
Subject Keywords
AI literacy
,
AI-TPACK
,
Ethics
,
Intelligent-TPACK
,
Teacher education
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105021348640&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/116815
Journal
Computers and Education Open
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100306
Collections
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
T. Aldemir, S. Kılınç, A. Bicer, P. Grant, T. Davis, and N. W. Sweany, “Intelligent‑TPACK in practice: design and evidence from a three‑week teacher preparation module,”
Computers and Education Open
, vol. 9, pp. 0–0, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105021348640&origin=inward.