Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Infrastructuralism, distributive politics and the persistence of populist rule
Date
2025-11-07
Author
Ozatagan, Guldem
Eraydın, Ayda
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
18
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This paper offers a practice-oriented lens and a context-sensitive approach to inquire into what populists do when in government and how resilient they remain. Bringing in-depth country insights on Turkey as an exemplary and early case that animates the triumph of populism as a global phenomenon, two conclusions are drawn. First, the development strategy of populist governments draws extensively on the promotion of large-scale infrastructure projects as a tool to generate and preferentially redistribute material benefits among varied sections of society and provide visual evidence of progress. Second, politically driven, tactical repertoires play a key, yet often unattended, role in perpetuating populist rule, variably allocating investments to core constituents, battleground and opposition regions. Hence, rather than constraining themselves to a repertoire that is commonly attributed to populists, they tactically shift strategies of reward and punishment to escape context-specific threats and solidify their grip on political power. It is concluded that 'infrastructure' serves as a critical arena for understanding the distributional dynamics and political strategies of populist policymaking, revealing how material interventions are strategically deployed to cultivate popular support and reinforce the durability of populist rule.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/116946
Journal
COMPETITION & CHANGE
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251392419
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
G. Ozatagan and A. Eraydın, “Infrastructuralism, distributive politics and the persistence of populist rule,”
COMPETITION & CHANGE
, pp. 0–0, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/116946.