Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Comparative assessment of eutrophication in the southern Black Sea using TRIX, BEAST, and NEAT
Date
2025-12-20
Author
Tan, İbrahim
Atabay, Hakan
Aslan, Ertuğrul
Mantıkcı, Asım Mustafa
TAŞKIN, ERGÜN
Kurt, Güley
Beken, Çolpan Polat
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
140
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This study is among the few that seek to provide an integrated assessment of eutrophication in the coastal region of the Southern Black Sea. Three methods were compared to evaluate eutrophication in the southern Black Sea coastal waters: the Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool (BEAST), the Nested Environmental Status Assessment Tool (NEAT), and the Trophic Index (TRIX). TRIX was not able to effectively differentiate between different levels of eutrophication in the southern Black Sea. Regardless of the assessment method used BEAST and NEAT, all the results indicated that the water quality in the southern Black Sea is either moderate or below. The BEAST and NEAT methodologies demonstrated a stronger correlation with eutrophication-related parameters compared to the TRIX approach. The BEAST assessment typically presented a worst-case scenario compared to NEAT. River-influenced coastal water bodies (CWBs), such as Sakarya (KAR02), Yeşilırmak (KAR07), and Kızılırmak (KAR10) had poor or bad status. Samsun province (KAR08), which has been pressure from both domestic and industrial activities, has been determined to be in a bad status. The study also highlights the critical need for site-specific indicators, reference values, and long-term data for effective assessment tools. The results provide evidence to support managers and decision-makers in monitoring and achieving good environmental status.
Subject Keywords
BEAST
,
Black Sea
,
Eutrophication
,
NEAT
,
One-out-all-out
,
Pressures
,
TRIX
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105019260946&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/117162
Journal
Regional Studies in Marine Science
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104538
Collections
Graduate School of Marine Sciences, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
İ. Tan et al., “Comparative assessment of eutrophication in the southern Black Sea using TRIX, BEAST, and NEAT,”
Regional Studies in Marine Science
, vol. 91, pp. 0–0, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105019260946&origin=inward.