Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Toward More Inclusive Classroom Practices in the Turkish EFL Contexts: A Case Study on the Integration of Critical and Dialogic Approaches to Field Placement
Date
2024-01-01
Author
Kizildağ, Ayşe
Kaçar, Işıl Günseli
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
16
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Educational settings in the twenty-first century, with linguistically and culturally diverse learner/teacher profiles, put a heavy emphasis on the integration of critical and dialogic pedagogical practices. Dialogic approaches incorporate opportunities for students’ co-participation and co-construction of thoughts, as well as their engagement in multifarious viewpoints and a boost in their self awareness and respect for others. In addition, critical approaches entail students to launch an inquiry into their established set of beliefs, new knowledge and non-inclusive “inequitable circumstances with a view toward social changes” (Kibler, etal., 2021, p.16). Considering students’ diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds as affordances and assets in the learning process, critical and dialogic education (CDE) promotes inclusive and equitable practices. Such practices provide fertile learning spaces for students through multivocality. In other words, each student’s participation in CDE with their own assets, unique opinions, and stances about the topic under discussion would provide productive spaces for active and inclusive learning. For example, hearing their differing and/or similar perspectives, synthesizing and analyzing various opinions, and expanding their own repertoires might form a basis for opening up multivocality in the participatory educational settings, in return creating more inclusive learning spaces for students in teacher education programs, and for the children and adults they will teach in the future.
URI
https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph?docid=b-9781350342101
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/117831
Relation
Critical Dialogic TESOL Teacher Education
Collections
Department of Foreign Language Education, Book / Book chapter
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
A. Kizildağ and I. G. Kaçar,
Toward More Inclusive Classroom Practices in the Turkish EFL Contexts: A Case Study on the Integration of Critical and Dialogic Approaches to Field Placement
. 2024.