Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
University Positioning in AI Policies: Comparative Insights From National Policies and Non-State Actor Influences in China, the European Union, India, Russia, and the United States
Date
2025-10-01
Author
Kaya Kaşıkcı, Sevgi
Glass, Chris R.
Camero, Eglis Chacon
Minaeva, Ekaterina
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
22
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This paper introduces a novel four-dimensional analytical framework to examine how universities are positioned within national artificial intelligence strategies amid intensifying geopolitical competition. Through systematic document analysis of policy frameworks across eight major global actors-the United Kingdom, Russia, India, the European Union, China, the United States, BigTech, and UNESCO-we identify distinct governance typologies that determine higher education's role in artificial intelligence ecosystems. Our findings quantify significant variations in how universities are instrumentalized across governance contexts-from talent pipelines in market-led systems to state-directed innovation hubs in centralised approaches. We document the emergence of value-aligned 'strategic education blocs' replacing universal academic networks, with India demonstrating unexpected leadership in education-specific policy provisions. This research advances the theoretical understanding of "technological statecraft" in higher education, demonstrating how the interplay between sovereignty concerns, regulatory philosophies, value systems, and public-private dynamics creates systematically different operating environments for universities across geopolitical contexts. These findings provide critical benchmarks for understanding institutional positioning in the global artificial intelligence landscape and challenge conventional internationalisation frameworks in an era of technological nationalism.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/117856
Journal
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70062
Collections
Department of Educational Sciences, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Kaya Kaşıkcı, C. R. Glass, E. C. Camero, and E. Minaeva, “University Positioning in AI Policies: Comparative Insights From National Policies and Non-State Actor Influences in China, the European Union, India, Russia, and the United States,”
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 0–0, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/117856.