Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Rethinking the people in the post-political era: Political subjectivity in Rancière and Laclau
Download
10773654.pdf
Gökhan Yağcı - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2026-1-2
Author
Yağcı, Gökhan
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
779
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This study addresses the invisibility of the people as a political subject within the framework of diagnoses regarding our living in a post-political era, treating it as a theoretical problem, and explores the possibilities of conceiving the figure of the people as a subject involved in the reconstitution of the political. Post-politics refers to a situation in which the political is suppressed by technocratic administration and governance norms, and antagonism is excluded in the name of consensus. Dependent on a dysfunctional representation, the people, who has become the instrumental figure of legitimacy and the object of political activity, are either depoliticized or reduced to uniform forms. Within this problematic framework, the study discusses the theoretical possibilities of reconceptualizing the people as a political subject by comparing the political theories of Jacques Rancière and Ernesto Laclau. In Rancière, the people is a subject of rupture that disrupts representational structures and enables the reemergence of politics based on equality. In Laclau, the people is a populist subject form constructed discursively and established through representation around a hegemonic empty signifier. The two thinkers’ understandings of political subjectivity offer different but striking possibilities for how the people can be made visible again in the post-political era. In this context, this thesis argues that the political subjectivation of the people in post-political conditions is only possible by considering Rancière’s rupture-based notion of equality and Laclau’s populist/hegemonic articulation logic together.
Subject Keywords
The people
,
Political subjectivity
,
Jacques Rancière
,
Ernesto Laclau
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/118270
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
G. Yağcı, “Rethinking the people in the post-political era: Political subjectivity in Rancière and Laclau,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2026.