Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Criterion shifts change the pattern of output interference
Download
s13421-025-01847-1.pdf
Date
2026-01-01
Author
Pala, Cavit Deniz
Kılıç Özhan, Aslı
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
45
views
9
downloads
Cite This
Output interference in recognition refers to a decrease in performance over the course of a test. The goal of the current study was to determine whether experimentally shifting the decision criterion changes the form of output interference and to identify a process account of any interaction. In two experiments, we manipulated the decision criterion via changes in the base rate of the old items at test (80%, 50%, 20%). Experiment 1 implemented this manipulation within-subjects and failed to induce criterion shifts. In contrast, when the base rate was manipulated between-subjects in Experiment 2, decision criteria differed across conditions. Qualitative patterns suggested that liberal criteria attenuated the hit rate (HR) decline and increased the false alarm rate (FAR) across blocks, whereas conservative criteria yielded steeper HR declines with relatively stable FAR. To further examine this effect, Experiment 3 employed longer test lists and a larger sample. The criterion was manipulated only via prior information about the base rates, while the actual base rate was 50% in all conditions. Experiment 3 revealed a significant interaction between response bias and output interference in HR and FAR. When we used an independent data set (Layher et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(11), 2075–2105, 2020), we demonstrated the same patterns. To account for these findings, we conducted simulations with the Retrieving Effectively from Memory (Shiffrin & Steyvers, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 145-166, 1997) model. The results were best captured by a learning-during-test mechanism in which every test item is encoded as a new memory trace.
Subject Keywords
Criterion
,
Output interference
,
Recognition memory
,
Response bias
,
Retrieving Effectively from Memory
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105027759824&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/118621
Journal
Memory and Cognition
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01847-1
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
C. D. Pala and A. Kılıç Özhan, “Criterion shifts change the pattern of output interference,”
Memory and Cognition
, pp. 0–0, 2026, Accessed: 00, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105027759824&origin=inward.