Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Developing an understanding of repeating patterning [Author Accepted Manuscript]
Download
Msall_et_al_2025_Developing_an_understanding_of_repeating_patterning_JNC_AAM.pdf
Date
2025-12-01
Author
Msall, Camille
Yıldırım, Betül Fatma
Özel, Serkan
Rittle-Johnson, Bethany
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
63
views
63
downloads
Cite This
Patterning knowledge encompasses the ability to notice and use predictable sequences, and identifying, extending, and describing patterns in objects and numbers are core to mathematical thinking. Identifying the pattern rule (e.g., the unit of repeat) is often considered an indicator of patterning understanding. The goal of the current paper is to consider potential operationalizations of repeating patterning understanding, as well as expand the toolkit for measuring repeating patterning understanding. The Early Patterning Assessment (EPA) is a research instrument that can be given online or in person, using mostly selected-response items. Across four rounds of data collection in the U.S. (n = 244) and one study in Türkiye (formerly known as Turkey) (n = 107), the repeating patterning measure was a reliable measure for 4-7-year-old children, with scores increasing with age. It was also easier and faster to administer than past assessments that used constructed response items. IRT Rasch models were used to assess construct validity and identify the difficulty level of different types of items, within a Construct Modeling Approach (Wilson, 2005). Complete the pattern was the easiest task, and explicitly identifying the unit of repeat was the most difficult task. We considered three potential indicators of repeating patterning understanding and suggested operationalizing children’s understanding of repeating patterns as demonstrating spontaneous use of correct procedures across multiple tasks and pattern units.
URI
https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.17029
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/118622
Journal
Journal of Numerical Cognition
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21468
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
C. Msall, B. F. Yıldırım, S. Özel, and B. Rittle-Johnson, “Developing an understanding of repeating patterning [Author Accepted Manuscript],”
Journal of Numerical Cognition
, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–37, 2025, Accessed: 00, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.17029.