Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Deleuze’s Spinozist Gambler: Lessons on Games of Chance
Date
2026-02-01
Author
Aksoy, Ilgin
Shores, Corry Michael
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
83
views
0
downloads
Cite This
At the end of Deleuze’s lectures on Spinoza of 1980–1981, he asks his students to “imagine a Spinozist gambler.” Yet he ends the course offering few clues about how to picture this figure. Here we provide an interpretation of the Spinozist gambler based on both its Spinozist conceptual context and its place in Deleuze’s broader philosophy of gambling play. Accordingly, we examine Spinozist gambling in terms of Deleuze’s account of Spinoza’s three types of knowledge, and we compare the Spinozist gambler to Deleuze’s more prominent figure of the Nietzschean dice-thrower. We thereby offer a tripartite characterization of the Spinozist gambler following its place in Spinoza’s epistemology, which we further refine by examining Deleuze’s comments on indeterminism in Spinoza and Nietzsche. We argue that, according to Deleuze, the Spinozist gambler controls chance through rational organization, whereas the Nietzschean gambler affirms and embraces chance itself. And by means of this analysis, we advance our knowledge of both Deleuze’s Spinozism and his philosophy of play.
Subject Keywords
Baruch Spinoza
,
Friedrich Nietzsche
,
gambling
,
Gilles Deleuze
,
indeterminism
,
play
,
Spinoza’s three kinds of knowledge
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105031270468&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/118895
Journal
Philosophies
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11010022
Collections
Department of Philosophy, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
I. Aksoy and C. M. Shores, “Deleuze’s Spinozist Gambler: Lessons on Games of Chance,”
Philosophies
, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2026, Accessed: 00, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105031270468&origin=inward.