Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
An updated meta-analysis of prognostic factors for secondary amputation following surgical repair of lower-extremity vascular trauma in both civilian and military populations
Date
2026-06-01
Author
Singh, Yash
Kersey, Alexander
Lauria, Alexis
Yet, Barbaros
Tai, Nigel
Rasmussen, Todd
Ratnayake, Amila
Perkins, Zane
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
34
views
0
downloads
Cite This
BACKGROUND: Lower-extremity vascular trauma (LEVT) remains a major cause of limb loss. A thorough understanding of prognostic factors associated with secondary amputation is essential for guiding decision-making, patient counselling, and risk stratification. This study aimed to further our understanding by incorporating novel risk factors and distinguishing outcomes between contemporary military and civilian populations. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify prognostic factors for amputation following LEVT repair. Bayesian meta-analysis was employed to calculate each factor's absolute pooled proportion, odds ratio, and 95% credible interval for secondary amputation. RESULTS: Sixty-nine studies, describing 8,553 limbs, were included. The pooled secondary amputation rate was 12.6% (12.0% in civilian and 14.9% in military populations). The strongest predictors were prolonged ischemia, major soft-tissue injury, compartment syndrome, fracture or dislocation, multiple-level arterial injury, and shock. High-energy mechanisms, such as explosive and blunt trauma, were also associated with a greater risk than penetrating injury. Among treatment-related factors, interposition grafting was linked to higher amputation rates than primary repair, while temporary vascular shunt use and prophylactic fasciotomy showed a modest association, particularly in civilian populations. Prehospital tourniquet use was not significantly associated with amputation. Demographic variables, venous repair, and graft type were also not predictive. Notable differences were observed between civilian and military injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary amputation remains common following LEVT repair, affecting approximately one in eight limbs. This meta-analysis reaffirms the prognostic importance of prolonged ischemia, shock, and compartment syndrome, alongside broader markers of injury severity. Emerging treatment-related factors likely reflect injury complexity rather than modifiable determinants. Differences between civilian and military cohorts highlight the need for tailored prognostic algorithms. Decision-making should prioritize early recognition of injury severity, rapid revascularisation, and anticipation of limb recovery trajectory. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2026;100: 961-972. Copyright (c) 2026 Wolters Kluwer Inc. All
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/119640
Journal
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004936
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Y. Singh et al., “An updated meta-analysis of prognostic factors for secondary amputation following surgical repair of lower-extremity vascular trauma in both civilian and military populations,”
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 961–972, 2026, Accessed: 00, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/119640.