Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Faculty development in higher education: A mixed-methods inquiry into institutional practices, academic needs and recommendations
Download
10818583.pdf
Hasan Şerif Baltacı - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2026-7-17
Author
Baltacı, Hasan Şerif
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
35
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This doctoral study explores the current state of faculty development in Turkish higher education through a three-phase sequential dominant mixed-methods design. In the first phase, institutional landscape of Centers for Teaching and Learning was mapped through a systematic content analysis of 22 university websites, uncovering the current practices initiated by CTLs. In the second phase, a needs analysis using a 77-item Faculty Needs Analysis Survey (FNAS) was distributed to a substantially larger pool of faculty across 24 universities using proportional stratified random sampling and a total of 477 academics responded to the survey. Exploratory factor analysis yielded nine underlying factors of FD needs, with international research networking, AI integration, and personal well-being emerging as the highest priority areas. Hierarchical regression results further demonstrated that participation in CTL activities significantly predicted lower perceived need scores. In the last phase, an expert panel of 18 scholars from diverse disciplines across three focus groups was conducted addressing design, implementation, and evaluation of FD programs. Findings revealed that effective FD requires needs-driven, modular, and career-sensitive program design; participatory and context-responsive implementation supported by strong institutional leadership; and multi-source, longitudinal evaluation systems capable of capturing behavioral and organizational change. Findings also indicate that FD in Türkiye remains largely reactive and fragmented. The study calls for a nationally coordinated FD framework, strengthened CTL capacity, and evidence-based program practices that are responsive to the diverse disciplinary, institutional, and career contexts of Turkish academics.
Subject Keywords
Faculty development
,
Professional development
,
Faculty development programs
,
Teaching and learning centers
,
Higher education
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/119986
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
H. Ş. Baltacı, “Faculty development in higher education: A mixed-methods inquiry into institutional practices, academic needs and recommendations,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2026.