Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
LACANIAN PSYCHOANALYTIC SUPERVISION: IS IT POSSIBLE TO DEFINE A FRAMEWORK?
Download
10831599.pdf
Fatoş Kartal - İmza Sayfası ve Beyan.pdf
Date
2026-8-31
Author
Kartal, Fatoş
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
90
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Lacanian psychoanalytic supervision occupies a central place in analytic formation, yet it has not been defined as a standardized method or a clearly delimited clinical procedure. Grounded in social constructionism, this qualitative study examined how supervisors in Türkiye conceptualize and practice Lacanian supervision and whether a framework can be identified. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 supervisors across clinical and institutional contexts; 14 interviews were analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Five themes were generated: naming in a double discourse: “control” and “supervision”; the clinical dynamic worked through in supervision: listening, blind spots, and "linguistic testimony"; the centrality of transference in the supervision process; the unstructured form of supervision: its subjective nature; and the topological functioning of Lacanian supervision in transforming the analyst. The findings indicate that Lacanian supervision cannot be reduced to a fixed model, standardized technique, or instructional transmission of knowledge, but neither is it arbitrary. It is organized around a recurring clinical logic in which the supervisee’s position in relation to the case, knowledge, desire, transference, and psychoanalytic practice is questioned. Rather than consolidating the position of the Subject Supposed to Know by supplying definitive answers, the supervisor opens a space in which the supervisee’s clinical position can be reworked. The analyst–analysand–supervisor relation emerged as a permeable, topological structure in which these positions affect one another. Rather than proposing a standardized framework, this study articulates the ethical-clinical coordinates of Lacanian supervision and offers a conceptual language for understanding its clinical and formative dimensions.
Subject Keywords
Lacanian Psychoanalytic Supervision
,
Control
,
Psychoanalytic Formation
,
Transference
,
Reflexive Thematic Analysis
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120646
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
F. Kartal, “LACANIAN PSYCHOANALYTIC SUPERVISION: IS IT POSSIBLE TO DEFINE A FRAMEWORK?,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2026.