Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
CALCULATIONS FOR HAZARDOUS AREA CLASSIFICATION IN POTENTIAL EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES
Download
10831620.pdf
Date
2026-8-06
Author
KAYA, Çağatay
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
69
views
67
downloads
Cite This
This study analysed the applicability, scope, outputs, and limitations of methods used for explosion protection. Its principal analytical basis was the comparison of IEC/ATEX-based hazardous area classification results with consequence-screening outputs generated by RAST software. HAZID and an EN 16985-based spray-process assessment complemented these approaches where specific hazard mechanisms and process conditions could not be represented adequately. The study aimed to identify fire- and explosion-related conditions that may remain unaddressed when methods are applied independently and to propose an integrated, scenario-based assessment approach. The analysis covered a 1,3-butadiene storage tank, an ethyl alcohol storage tank, a Class 3 flammable liquid warehouse, a spray process, and areas containing combustible dusts and energetic materials. IEC/ATEX methods determined zone types and distances around normal or foreseeable release sources, while RAST identified effect distances associated with low-probability, high-consequence fire, flammable-cloud, and explosion scenarios. The findings demonstrated that RAST effect distances should not be treated as hazardous area boundaries, but as a complementary layer for emergency planning, scenario prioritisation, and risk-reduction decisions. Consequently, explosion protection in complex industrial facilities should integrate normal releases, major accident scenarios, confined-space behaviour, ventilation adequacy, dust explosion potential, energetic-material sensitivity, and existing barriers. The proposed framework supports hazardous area classification, Ex equipment selection, consequence screening, emergency planning, and risk-reduction decisions while addressing the limitations of relying on a single method.
Subject Keywords
HAZID, IEC/ATEX, Explosive Atmosphere, RAST, Hazardous Area Classification
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120675
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
Ç. KAYA, “CALCULATIONS FOR HAZARDOUS AREA CLASSIFICATION IN POTENTIAL EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2026.