Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Comparative evaluation of offset scheduling methods for AFDX networks
Download
COMPARATIVE_EVALUATION_OF_OFFSET_SCHEDULING_METHODS_FOR_AFDX_NETWORKS.pdf
Date
2026-9-3
Author
Çelik, Kaan
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
91
views
0
downloads
Cite This
AFDX (Avionics Full-Duplex Switched Ethernet) is a flow-based, fully switched avionics network standard. Its flows, called Virtual Links (VLs), are traffic-regulated to support time-critical communication. Network Calculus computes worst-case end-to-end delay bounds. Such bounds may become optimistic when legitimate VL configurations violate analysis assumptions, or highly pessimistic when known temporal relations among transmissions are not exploited. This thesis revisits an existing offset-aware Network Calculus analysis for periodic VLs with source offsets, corrects its treatment of source-timing information under general routing, and refines it to obtain tighter VL-specific bounds. Our first contribution shows that same-source VLs that diverge and later reconverge can invalidate source-derived serialization relations and lead to optimistic bounds. We introduce route-coherent source groups, which retain these relations only when justified by the VLs' common route history. The second contribution reduces the remaining aggregation pessimism through VL-specific analysis. For the source group containing the target VL, we retain the exact frame sequence at the first switch and construct conservative compacted sequences downstream, while other traffic remains bounded by safe arrival curves. We establish the correctness of both formulations analytically and evaluate them using controlled examples and large realistic configurations. The experiments confirm that the missing route-coherence condition in the existing method can lead to optimistic bounds. The VL-specific analysis produces tighter bounds for up to 99.9% of paths, with mean path-level reductions of up to 31.92%. Overall, route coherence is necessary for correctness, while preserving target-specific timing information significantly reduces pessimism in large AFDX networks.
Subject Keywords
AFDX
,
Offset-aware network calculus
,
Virtual link
,
End-to-end delay
,
Compacted source sequences
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120687
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
K. Çelik, “Comparative evaluation of offset scheduling methods for AFDX networks,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2026.