Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
GENERATIVE LANGUAGE MODELS VERSUS ENCODER-BASED LANGUAGE MODELS FOR MULTILINGUAL PHISHING EMAIL DETECTION
Download
nesil_bor_tez.pdf.pdf
Nesil Bor İmza Sayfası.pdf
Date
2026-9-2
Author
Bor, Nesil
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
50
views
0
downloads
Cite This
This thesis evaluates 25 language models to compare generative and classification architectures for phishing email detection in resource-constrained local environments. A major challenge in modern cybersecurity is the lack of localized, psychologically accurate threat data for languages other than English. To address this gap, we used the collaboratively developed OLTA-TR dataset. Built on Cialdini’s principles of persuasion, this synthetic Turkish corpus trains models to recognize manipulative intent rather than just filtering static keywords. Because endpoint security often requires running models locally, we managed hardware limitations using QLoRA fine-tuning and 4-bit quantization techniques. Experimental results combining the MeAJOR archive and OLTA-TR show that generative models consistently suffer from a helpful AI bias. While this bias caused formatting errors, the underlying autoregressive decoding process introduced critical latency issues when integrating these models into automated workflows. In contrast, smaller classification models adhered to formatting constraints consistently and completed their analysis in under a second. Most notably, the mmBERT model achieved a 99.49% Macro F1-Score, showing that effective phishing email detection relies mostly on recognizing psychological intent rather than language-specific grammar. To explain how these models make decisions, we introduced a dual-layer interpretability framework. Ultimately, while generative models are flexible, fine-tuned classification models offer a more reliable and secure method for real-time defense.
Subject Keywords
phishing email detection
,
generative language models
,
encoder models
,
low resource languages
,
cybersecurity
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120718
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
N. Bor, “GENERATIVE LANGUAGE MODELS VERSUS ENCODER-BASED LANGUAGE MODELS FOR MULTILINGUAL PHISHING EMAIL DETECTION,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2026.