Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Making sense of martial practice: training orientation as an analytical lens for embodied leisure
Download
index.pdf
Date
2026-09-01
Author
Yazıcı, Deniz Kaan
Pehlivanlı Kadayifci, Ezgi
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
29
views
0
downloads
Cite This
As martial arts have become increasingly prominent within leisurestudies, scholars have examined their contributions to wellbeing,identity, belonging, and lifelong participation. Yet the concept ofmartial arts remains analytically unstable. Existing classificationstypically distinguish practices by institutional status, historicaldevelopment, or stylistic tradition, but often fail to capture thediverse pedagogical purposes and embodied experiences thatcoexist within the same practice. We argue that this ambiguityreflects a broader epistemological challenge concerning how mar-tial practices are understood, organised, and studied. Rather thanproposing another taxonomy, this article introduces training orien-tation as an analytical lens. We develop three ideal-typical orienta-tions—disciplinary, competitive, and combative—understood asdynamic pedagogical logics rather than fixed or mutually exclusivecategories. These orientations may coexist, shift over time, and varyacross instructors, organisations, and practitioners. The frameworkis illustrated through a critical reading of Turkish academic litera-ture, treated as an analytically revealing context where classificatoryambiguities become especially visible. Foregrounding trainingorientation, we argue, enables more nuanced analysis of embodiedlearning, gender, ageing, and lifelong participation. The articletherefore proposes training orientation as a heuristic vocabularyfor more reflexive and context-sensitive research into how martialpractices are organised, experienced, and made meaningful withincontemporary leisure contexts
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120963
Journal
LEISURE STUDIES
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2026.2733346
Collections
Department of Sociology, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
D. K. Yazıcı and E. Pehlivanlı Kadayifci, “Making sense of martial practice: training orientation as an analytical lens for embodied leisure,”
LEISURE STUDIES
, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2026, Accessed: 00, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120963.