Patents and innovation in pharmaceutical industry in Turkey : the comparision of patent system with some selected countries

Download
2010
Özdemir, Tuncer Elif
The aim of this thesis is to make policy recommendations for Turkey in order to facilitate innovative activities resulting in more patent applications in pharmaceutical industry through comparing her with the selected countries; USA, EU, Japan, India, China and Korea. The comparison is performed in terms of the patent, research and development (R&D) expenditures and basic research. This study begins with firstly indicating the relationship between patents and innovation in sector basis. When it is looked at this relationship patents are the most necessary tool for pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, in the main part of the thesis the patents and innovations in pharmaceutical sector are analyzed mostly. However, this analysis is not done in all aspects but it is done in terms of research and development expenditures and basic research. Patent is mainly a result of research and development activities. Besides, basic research is also effective in making innovations and so in patent system. Because of these reasons, the relationship between patents and innovations in pharmaceutical industry are covered in terms of these two aspects-R&D expenditures and basic v research-. These relationships are analyzed in country level. In this thesis, in order to see the right route for Turkey and give some advises to Turkish patent and innovation system especially in pharmaceutical industry Turkey is compared with USA, EU, Japan, China, India and Korea. The reason to take USA, EU and Japan is that, these countries are developed countries, the biggest patent offices in the world are in these countries and the number of patent applications is the highest in the offices of these countries. On the other hand, China, India and Korea are taken as subject to the comparison because these countries are developing countries like Turkey and the development levels of these countries are not too higher than Turkey. In this thesis, through comparing Turkey with the selected countries, some policy recommendations are done for Turkey and this thesis may open door to further studies on the patent and innovation system of Turkey especially in pharmaceutical industry.

Suggestions

The structure and the effectiveness of Turkish investment incentive system
Toprak, Deniz; Somel, A.muhittin Cem; Department of Economics (2005)
The aim of this thesis is to investigate the structure and the effectiveness of the investment incentive system in Turkey. The theoretical definition and the economic and social targets of incentives, and the direction, problems and the effectiveness of the investment incentive system are investigated. This study finds that the most prominent target of investment incentives is to alleviate the unemployment problem in Turkey. The regional investment incentives seem to be successful in the western part of the...
Adaptation of Turkey to the European Union research and innovation policies during the accession period
Atmaca, Serkan; Ege, Aylin; Department of Science and Technology Policy Studies (2006)
The aim of this thesis is to analyze the adaptation of Turkey to EU research and innovation policies in the light of developments in within their own dynamics, and within the framework of obligations of the accession period. A comparative analysis of Turkish and EU policies is made by pointing out the weaknesses of Turkey, which are supported by related indicators specifying the gap between EU in research and innovation capabilities. In accordance with the findings of the comparison of Turkey and EU, this s...
Impact analysis of industrial research and development subsidy programs in Turkey: an appraisal of quantitative approaches
Tandoğan, Vedat Sinan; Pamukcu, Mehmet Teoman; Department of Science and Technology Policy Studies (2011)
This thesis has two objectives in the field of policy evaluation that recently received extensive attention from international science and technology community. First, an attempt is made to examine, in the Turkish context, the effects of public subsidies on private research and development (R&D), selecting and implementing a suitable empirical methodology. Second, in the context of emerging economies, it aims to contribute to the existing impact analysis literature by providing an evaluation study for the p...
Restructuring agriculture and adaptive processes in rural areas : the case of cotton sector in Adana-Karataş
Ayalp, Ekrem; Pınarcıoğlu, Mehmet Melih; Department of City and Regional Planning (2007)
While there has been an ongoing transformation of traditional agriculture and new regulations on agricultural institutional formations and market structures, the aim of this thesis is tracing forward to identify who the losers and the winners of this process would be. The background question is about the new faces of the rural areas and, the study considers what the current importance of agriculture in those areas is and if rural areas as living formations are in transition, then what will be the implicatio...
Science diplomacy: a proactive policy approache for international cooperation in science and technology and an alternative model for Turkey
Uygun, Zafer; Akçomak, İbrahim Semih; Department of Science and Technology Policy Studies (2015)
The main objective of this thesis is to analyse the mechanisms and the methods followed by the countries having “good practice” in efficient utilization of science diplomacy (SD) as international cooperation policy measure for national capacity building in science, technology and innovation (STI) and economic development. This aim will be achieved by answering the main research questions “What activities do countries perform under SD; how they are different from each other?” and “In comparison to other coun...
Citation Formats
T. E. Özdemir, “Patents and innovation in pharmaceutical industry in Turkey : the comparision of patent system with some selected countries,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2010.