Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
anonymousUser
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Videos
Videos
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Contact us
Contact us
Archival texts and bodies in Thomas Hardy’s and E.M. Forster’s short stories
Download
index.pdf
Date
2014
Author
Korkut, Esin
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
11
views
42
downloads
Cite This
This thesis has been written with a view to making analyses of Thomas Hardy's and E.M. Forster's short stories in terms of the discourse the stories produce on textuality and archive. The thesis has been based on Derrida's approaches to textuality and archive, in which Derrida regards both as unfinished constructs. In the deconstruction of these discourses, Derrida deals with the metaphysical assumptions associated with these terms. This thesis, as well as making use of some terminology introduced by Derrida, is also based on what Derrida has revealed to be an important part of metaphysical assumptions such as the artificiality and supplementarity attributed to writing when compared to speech. However, Derrida also reveals that this metaphysical discourse is not consistent in itself; it has ambiguities and contradictions. After scrutinizing Hardy's and Forster's short stories, this thesis also reveals that the stories' discourse on writing and archive shares some common features with the texts analyzed by Derrida. For instance, like Plato's "Phaedrus", Hardy's and Forster's short stories also consider textuality as a substitute to memory and underline the priority and importance of memory. These common features reveal that the short stories analyzed in this thesis partake in this metaphysical discourse. The analyses in this thesis also reveal that this apparently consistent discourse on archive and textuality has some contradictions. For instance, while the stories create an opposition between body and text, they describe textualized bodies. Additionally, Hardy's stories seem to underline the importance of presence but they, at the same time, describe this presence as a myth.
Subject Keywords
Deconstruction.
,
Discourse analysis.
,
English literature
URI
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12617927/index.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/23921
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
E. Korkut, “Archival texts and bodies in Thomas Hardy’s and E.M. Forster’s short stories,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, 2014.