Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Catching up with Method and Process Practice: An Industry-Informed Baseline for Researchers
Download
index.pdf
Date
2019-01-01
Author
Kluender, Jil
Hebig, Regina
Tell, Paolo
Kuhrmann, Marco
Nakatumba-Nabende, Joyce
Heldal, Rogardt
Krusche, Stephan
Fazal-Baqaie, Masud
Felderer, Michael
Genero Bocco, Marcela Fabiana
Kuepper, Steffen
Licorish, Sherlock A.
Lopez, Gustavo
McCaffery, Fergal
Özcan Top, Özden
Prause, Christian R.
Prikladnicki, Rafael
Tuzun, Eray
Pfahl, Dietmar
Schneider, Kurt
MacDonell, Stephen G.
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
178
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Software development methods are usually not applied by the book. Companies are under pressure to continuously deploy software products that meet market needs and stakeholders’ requests. To implement efficient and effective development processes, companies utilize multiple frameworks, methods and practices, and combine these into hybrid methods. A common combination contains a rich management framework to organize and steer projects complemented with a number of smaller practices providing the development teams with tools to complete their tasks. In this paper, based on 732 data points collected through an international survey, we study the software development process use in practice. Our results show that 76.8% of the companies implement hybrid methods. Company size as well as the strategy in devising and evolving hybrid methods affect the suitability of the chosen process to reach company or project goals. Our findings show that companies that combine planned improvement programs with process evolution can increase their process’ suitability by up to 5%.
Subject Keywords
Software development
,
Software process
,
Hybrid methods
,
Survey research
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/32665
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-seip.2019.00036
Collections
Graduate School of Informatics, Conference / Seminar
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
Software development in practice : a qualitative study in Turkish defense sector
Dilber, Başak; Özkan Yıldırım, Sevgi; Department of Information Systems (2013)
Since management is an abstract concept, modeling or simulating software development projects is not exactly possible. Thus successful software project development and the factors affecting it have been popular fields of research for the last half century. The aim of this qualitative grounded theory study is to bring out the essence of the experience of people working as software developers in a specific organization operating in Turkey; to come up with a set of principles explaining the main success factor...
Tailoring ISO/IEC 12207 for instructional software development
Demirörs, Onur; Demirors, E; Tarhan, A; Yildiz, A (2000-09-07)
This paper describes our experience on tailoring ISO/IEC 12207 for instructional software development. The project was initiated by a large government agency, and the process defined is to be followed by its suppliers during a typical software development contract. The process if targeted especially to small software development companies and provides guidance on what to do with respect to the customer's expectations
Using feature models for reusability in agile methods
Jedyk, Marcin; Doğru, Ali Hikmet; Department of Computer Engineering (2011)
The approach proposed in this thesis contributes to implementing source code reuse and re-engineering techniques for agile software development. This work includes an introduction to feature models and some of the Feature Oriented Software Development (FOSD) practices to achieve a lightweight way of retrieving source code. A Feature model created during the course of following FOSD practices serves as an additional layer of documentation which represents the problem space for the developed application. This...
Business process modelling based computer-aided software functional requirements generation
Su, M. Onur; Demirörs, Onur; Department of Information Systems (2004)
Problems of requirements which are identified in the earlier phase of a software development project can deeply affect the success of the project. Thus studies which aim to decrease these problems are crucial. Automation is foreseen to be one of the possible solutions for decreasing or removing some of the problems originating from requirements. This study focuses on the development and implementation of an automated tool that will generate requirements in natural language from business process models. In t...
Assess agility : agility assessment approach supported with an automated web based agility assessment tool
Adalı, Onat Ege; Demirörs, Onur; Özcan Top, Özden; Department of Information Systems (2017)
Today, more and more organizations are adopting agile methodologies to their software development processes. However, this adoption process is not straightforward due to the extensive knowledge and effort required. Currently, most agile adopters use assessments at a regular basis to understand the extent of their agility and to determine the success of their agile adoption. There have been many studies conducted about agile assessment models in the literature. Still, these models require significant time an...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
J. Kluender et al., “Catching up with Method and Process Practice: An Industry-Informed Baseline for Researchers,” 2019, Accessed: 00, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/32665.