Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
anonymousUser
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Açık Bilim Politikası
Açık Bilim Politikası
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse
Browse
By Issue Date
By Issue Date
Authors
Authors
Titles
Titles
Subjects
Subjects
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations
Date
2004-05-01
Author
GLİCK, P
LAMEİRAS, M
FİSKE, ST
ECKES, T
MASSER, B
VOLPATO, C
MANGANELLİ, AM
PEK, JCX
HUANG, LL
Sakallı, Nuray
CASTRO, YR
PEREIRA, MLD
WILLEMSEN, TM
BRUNNER, A
Six-Materna, I
WELLS, R
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
4
views
0
downloads
A 16-nation study involving 8,360 participants revealed that hostile and benevolent attitudes toward men, assessed by the Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (P. Glick & S. T. Fiske, 1999), were (a) reliably measured across cultures, (b) positively correlated (for men and women, within samples and across nations) with each other and with hostile and benevolent sexism toward women (Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, P. Glick & S. T. Fiske, 1996), and (c) negatively correlated with gender equality in cross-national comparisons. Stereotype measures indicated that men were viewed as having less positively valenced but more powerful traits than women. The authors argue that hostile as well as benevolent attitudes toward men reflect and support gender inequality by characterizing men as being designed for dominance.
Subject Keywords
Sociology and Political Science
,
Social Psychology
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/38073
Journal
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713
Collections
Department of Psychology, Article