Friedrich List & Joseph Schumpeter: Strange bedfellows in the pedigree of (development) economics?

Date

2016-4

Author

Özçelik, Emre
Özveren, Eyüp

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

9
views

36
downloads

Cite This

Arguing that Joseph Schumpeter generalized development economics, whereas List saw it as of limited scope, we take a closer look at List’s approach. We discover that, for List, theories are time- and space-bound, and historical and institutional parameters help define their applicability. When history and institutions matter, mere internal dynamics cannot be taken as the sole motor-force of development and change. While Schumpeter’s approach is associated with evolutionary economics, List’s is affiliated with institutional economics. Institutional economics and evolutionary economics are not exactly the same but they are not poles apart either. This holds the key to understanding the uneasy yet inevitable combination to which List and Schumpeter contribute in the context of contemporary development-friendly economics. It is in this vein that we attempt to compare, contrast and somewhat synthesize List and Schumpeter in terms of their conceptions of capitalist development and economic evolution.

Subject Keywords

Friedrich List, Joseph Schumpeter, Institutional economics, Evolutionary economics, Development economics

URI

http://www2.feas.metu.edu.tr/metusd/ojs/index.php/metusd/article/view/860
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/58214

Collections

Department of Economics, Article