Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
From situation analysis to decision options: An improved swot approach
Date
2007-12-01
Author
Lu, Weisheng
Flanagan, Roger
Pekeriçli, Mehmet Koray
Jewell, Carol
Metadata
Show full item record
Item Usage Stats
74
views
0
downloads
Cite This
Decision making theory suggests that a typical process for making decision comprises sequential steps such as setting objectives, understanding decision situation, generating decision alternatives, evaluating and selecting an optimal option, and so on. This research focuses on the process of generating decision options from a situation analysis. In practice, this process still heavily depends on decision maker's creativity despite the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) approach has greatly facilitated it. This research aims to aid the generation of decision options by considering artificial intelligence (AI) as a possible solution. It starts with a critical review of the SWOT as a powerful and popular tool for conducting situation analysis. A weighted matrix is introduced to improve the current SWOT approach. By manipulating the matrix, a heuristic rule is derived. The heuristic rule can be fed into future AI software to generate various decision options.
Subject Keywords
SWOT analyse
,
Quantitative strategic planning matrix
,
Analytic network process
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877626744&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/74562
Conference Name
25th Inaugural Construction Management and Economics: 'Past, Present and Future' Conference, CME 2007 (16-18 July 2007)
Collections
Department of Architecture, Conference / Seminar
Suggestions
OpenMETU
Core
An interactive approach with filtering to find a preferred solution of a decision maker
TUNCER ŞAKAR, CEREN; Karakaya, Gülşah (Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 2019-01-01)
In decision making problems that contain multiple and conflicting objectives, it is not an easy and straightforward task to determine the most preferred solution of a decision maker. In this study, an interactive method is proposed to converge to the most preferred solution of the decision maker. The proposed method elicits preference information from the decision maker in consecutive iterations and reduces the solution space accordingly. The decision maker evaluates a limited number of solutions in each it...
Evolving a hierarchical decision making mechanism using fuzzy logic
Beldek, Ulas; Leblebicioğlu, Mehmet Kemal (2008-12-01)
In this study, a new hierarchical decision-making and decision-fusion mechanism is introduced for solving decision making problems in a consistent manner. This mechanism is constructed by using a genetic algorithm. The proposed mechanism employs fuzzy logic and a performance index determined based on the performance of decision-making agents at successive hierarchical levels. The mechanism is such that the decisions in previous levels are influential on the current level decisions according to the performan...
A parallel between regret theory and outranking methods for multicriteria decision making under imprecise information
Ozerol, Gul; Karasakal, Esra (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2008-08-01)
Incorporation of the behavioral issues of the decision maker (DM) is among the aspects that each Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) method implicitly or explicitly takes into account. As postulated by regret theory, the feelings of regret and rejoice are among the behavioral issues associated with the entire decision making process. Within the context of MCDM, the DM may feel regret, when the chosen alternative is compared with another one having at least one better criterion value. PROMETHEE II is a wide...
An Interactive partitioning approach for multiobjective decision making under a general monotone utility function
Karasakal, Esra (2013-09-01)
We develop an interactive partitioning approach for solving the multiobjective decision making problem of a decision maker (DM) who has an implicit general monotone utility function. The approach reduces feasible solution space using the DM's preferences. Hypothetical solutions called partition ideals (PIs) that dominate portions of the efficient frontier are generated and those that are inferior to a feasible solution are used to eliminate the dominated regions. We investigate the issues in representation ...
Combining data and meta-analysis to build Bayesian networks for clinical decision support
Yet, Barbaros; Rasmussen, Todd E.; Tai, Nigel R. M.; Marsh, D. William R. (2014-12-01)
Complex clinical decisions require the decision maker to evaluate multiple factors that may interact with each other. Many clinical studies, however, report 'univariate' relations between a single factor and outcome. Such univariate statistics are often insufficient to provide useful support for complex clinical decisions even when they are pooled using meta-analysis. More useful decision support could be provided by evidence-based models that take the interaction between factors into account. In this paper...
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
W. Lu, R. Flanagan, M. K. Pekeriçli, and C. Jewell, “From situation analysis to decision options: An improved swot approach,” Reading, United Kingdom, 2007, p. 699, Accessed: 00, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877626744&origin=inward.