Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
On fundamental inconsistencies in a commonly used modification of a fluid model for glow discharge
Download
Zhou_2024_Plasma_Sources_Sci._Technol._33_077001.pdf
Date
2024-07-01
Author
Zhou, Chen
Rafatov, İsmail
Wang, Ying
Kudryavtsev, Anatoly
Yuan, Chengxun
Yao, Jingfeng
Zhou, Zhongxiang
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
54
views
25
downloads
Cite This
This work considers the fundamental contradictions in the concept of one of the most well-known and widely used modifications of the fluid model for simulation of a glow discharge (GD), the ‘local mean energy approximation’ (LMEA). In this model, it is proposed to determine the kinetic coefficients in the electron particle and energy balance equations as functions of the electron mean energy (temperature) rather than local electric field, using a one-to-one correspondence between these parameters through the electron Boltzmann equation. It is shown that the scope of applicability of this model, like any other modification of the fluid model, is limited by the local mode of formation of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF). Therefore, as demonstrated by the examples of typical 1D and 2D problems for a GD in argon, its extension to the region of nonlocal EEDF is in no way justified and leads not only to serious errors in the results, but also to a logically intractable situation in attempts to apply the main postulate of the LMEA model to the region of a weak (or even reverse) electric field in a negative glow plasma. At the same time, the apparent reliability of calculations within the framework of the LMEA model for a number of parameters, in our opinion, only slows down progress in modeling of gas discharge plasma.
Subject Keywords
fluid model
,
glow discharge
,
low-temperature plasma
,
modelling of plasma
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198589085&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/110224
Journal
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ad5ebc
Collections
Department of Physics, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
C. Zhou et al., “On fundamental inconsistencies in a commonly used modification of a fluid model for glow discharge,”
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 0–0, 2024, Accessed: 00, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198589085&origin=inward.