Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
DOMAIN AND CONVENTIONALITY MATTER IN PREDICATE METAPHOR PROCESSING: A STUDY ON TURKISH PRESCHOOLERS
Download
RE_Thesis_2023.pdf
Date
2023-8-7
Author
Erdoğdu, Rümeysa
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
222
views
116
downloads
Cite This
There is no consensus on how predicate metaphors are processed in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that focuses on predicate metaphor processing in children considering linguistic and developmental factors. To address this gap, this study aims to assess preschoolers’ processing of predicate metaphors with varying levels of conventionality and metaphorical domains. Turkish-speaking children between the ages of 4 and 5 (N=29, Mage= 4,7) participated in our study testing spatial motion metaphors in a predicate form through a gesture-based act-out task followed by a verbal assessment. We manipulated conventionality (familiar, unfamiliar, novel) and metaphorical domain (time, idea, body). Children's responses were categorized as metaphorical, literal, or no response in both tasks. Language scores were also assessed. Children’s responses were compared through mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression. The results yielded significant domain-level differences that is, concrete metaphorical domains triggered the literal meaning of the vehicle that implies indirect processing, while abstract domains led to a more direct metaphorical interpretation. Moreover, the results supported that conventionality levels influence the processing of metaphors. Receptive language and age revealed that children avoided giving no response as their age and language abilities increased. To our knowledge, no studies showed that the metaphorical domain influences participants’ reliance on the literal meaning of the vehicle in predicate metaphors. Therefore, we suggest that there may not be a single and unified processing mechanism for all metaphors, but the domain of the metaphor as well as its conventionality determines how it will be accessed.
Subject Keywords
Metaphors, Cognitive Linguistics, Figurative Language, Direct Processing, Indirect Processing
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/104821
Collections
Graduate School of Social Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
R. Erdoğdu, “DOMAIN AND CONVENTIONALITY MATTER IN PREDICATE METAPHOR PROCESSING: A STUDY ON TURKISH PRESCHOOLERS,” M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University, 2023.