Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
Assessment and comparison of the gamma and bc transition Models for external flows
Download
10.47480-isibted.1391106-3538770.pdf
Date
2023-01-01
Author
Karabay, Sami
Baran, Özgür Uğraş
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
28
views
86
downloads
Cite This
Modelling of transition from the laminar to turbulent flow became a hot topic due to recent developments in renewable energy, UAV technologies and similar aerospace applications. The transition from laminar flow to turbulence is challenging to model in CFD analysis. The drag is overestimated if the transition is neglected in CFD solutions by assuming the flow is fully turbulent. This results in missing the fundamental characteristics of the flow and inaccurate predictions of the flow field. The most popular transition models are Menter's models applied to the SST turbulence model and the Baş-Çakmakçıoğlu (BC) transition model applied to the Spalart-Almaras model. We have focused on Menter's simpler but more popular γ model and Baş Çakmakçıoğlu models. The γ model relies on the local turbulence intensity, which makes applying the model challenging in external flows. This difficulty stems from the complex relationship between turbulence decay and transition onset. BC transition model utilizes the free stream turbulence intensity. Both models are verified using the Klebanoff and ERCOFTAC flat plate cases and several 2D external flow cases. Skin friction coefficient results are compared to experimental data. Results show that both models predict transition very similarly. BC model is computationally cheaper and easier to implement than the γ model. Also, γ model suffers from boundary conditions ambiguity.
Subject Keywords
CFD
,
Flat Plate
,
Intermittency
,
Transition Flow
,
Transition Model
,
Geçişli Akış
,
Geçiş Modeli
,
Kesiklilik
,
HAD
,
Düz Levha
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179133166&origin=inward
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/106983
Journal
Isi Bilimi Ve Teknigi Dergisi/ Journal of Thermal Science and Technology
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47480/isibted.1391106
Collections
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Article
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
S. Karabay and Ö. U. Baran, “Assessment and comparison of the gamma and bc transition Models for external flows ,”
Isi Bilimi Ve Teknigi Dergisi/ Journal of Thermal Science and Technology
, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 135–157, 2023, Accessed: 00, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179133166&origin=inward.