Show/Hide Menu
Hide/Show Apps
Logout
Türkçe
Türkçe
Search
Search
Login
Login
OpenMETU
OpenMETU
About
About
Open Science Policy
Open Science Policy
Open Access Guideline
Open Access Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Postgraduate Thesis Guideline
Communities & Collections
Communities & Collections
Help
Help
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Guides
Guides
Thesis submission
Thesis submission
MS without thesis term project submission
MS without thesis term project submission
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission with DOI
Publication submission
Publication submission
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
General Information
General Information
Copyright, Embargo and License
Copyright, Embargo and License
Contact us
Contact us
DECONSTRUCTIVISM AND DECONSTRUCTION: A CRITICAL RE-EVALUATION OF DERRIDA THROUGH HEIDEGGER WITH REGARD TO ARCHITECTURE
Download
Thesis Obeid.pdf
Date
2024-3
Author
Eskandarnezhad, Obeid
Metadata
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
.
Item Usage Stats
409
views
1032
downloads
Cite This
Deconstructivism in architecture flourished in the 80s after influence of Derrida’s deconstruction in architecture. Displacement, fragmentation, and disorder are among those attributions of deconstructivism that resulted in exaggerated visual appearance to enhance the spatial experience to address the problem of indifference. Criticized as meaningless, un-functional, and anti-historical, deconstructivism is linked to nihilism and relativism. Reviewing major deconstructivist architects (including Libeskind, Gehry, Hadid, Koolhaas, Himmelb(l)au, Eisenman, and Tschumi) suggest a possible missed link between deconstruction and deconstructivism. While main evaluation of deconstructivism is based on some deconstruction’s keywords (like differance, trace, supplement, absence), this study aims to transcend this literally connected relationship in searching for deeper ontological and epistemological analysis of deconstruction together with conceptual sources of these thoughts to be argued for understanding the relationship between architecture, deconstruction and deconstructivism – as a necessity for progressive architectural criticism. Therefore, this thesis steps further of Derrida’s keywords into the main opposition against metaphysics of presence that has governed architecture since Plato which can be observed within part-whole relationship or influence of subjectivism and objectivism in architecture. Opposed to metaphysical thinking, Heidegger’s philosophy about Being and authentic Dasein is examined and interpreted through which a triplet strategy emerges based on recognition of Being as the abyss and foundationless foundation that can be confirmed within Caputo’s radical hermeneutics and Derrida’s strategy of deconstruction. Hence, the triplet strategy becomes the possible missed link between deconstructivism and deconstruction through which problematics of deconstructivism can be addressed and could bring an envision to architectural interpretation and criticism.
Subject Keywords
Deconstructivism
,
Deconstruction
,
Metaphysics of Presence
,
Being
,
Authentic Dasein
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11511/109211
Collections
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Thesis
Citation Formats
IEEE
ACM
APA
CHICAGO
MLA
BibTeX
O. Eskandarnezhad, “DECONSTRUCTIVISM AND DECONSTRUCTION: A CRITICAL RE-EVALUATION OF DERRIDA THROUGH HEIDEGGER WITH REGARD TO ARCHITECTURE,” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2024.