Comparison of methods for extracting of evoked potentials

Date

2003-09-21

Author

Kilic, S
Gençer, Nevzat Güneri
Baykal, Buyurman

Metadata

Show full item record

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Item Usage Stats

6
views

0
downloads

Cite This

In this work the algorithms are divided into three groups. First group consists of one method as Subspace Regularization Method (SRM). Second group consists of the combination both Wiener Filter (WF) & Subspace Method (SM) and Coherence Weighted Wiener Filter (CWWF) & SM in different order. The application of SM to filtered data with WF is proposed in literature, in this study we propose the reverse of this method using with the CWWF instead of WF. Third group consists of adaptive filters (Adaptive Kalman Filter (AKF), RLS and LMS). We propose two new methods including the combination of SM & AKF and SM & LMS Filter in 3(rd) group. All methods belong to 2(nd) and 3(rd) group are compared to each other and then best of each group are compared to SRM and Ensemble Averaging (EA) quantitatively. The highest SNR values are supplied with SRM among all methods mentioned in this work for small number of trials. However, the combination both SM & CWWF and the combination both SM & AKF provide higher output SNR values than EA, also. All the combination both SM and one method increase the advantages than each of them separately.

Subject Keywords

Evoked potential, Wiener filtering, Subspace method, Adaptive filtering, Subspace regularization

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11511/42067

Collections

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Conference / Seminar